Some Poignancy And Smartass Musings

Considerations by Gary Hambley

Tag Archives: Behaviour

Higher Education Equals Indoctrination

Higher Education Equals Indoctrination

The “Globe & Mail” ran this story today, “John Furlong has won the right to get on with his life“.

This is no different than the Ryerson Teacher who led her class to the steps of the courthouse on the day the Ghomeshi verdict was being released on her “We believe the survivors” crusade. This thing knew from the conduct, just as we all knew from the conduct of the women on the stand it was going to be not guilty. It didn’t matter because she had to get her message out that she was right and that lying on the stand is okay and Law is wrong.
Careless with the truth the Justice said. Yet the conduct and the actions of the women just didn’t matter to this thing that led the class charge to the courthouse. Her actions are wrong on so many levels. I wonder if you were in her class and didn’t attend you got a failing grade. You have to believe anyone who could do what this thing did would certainly fail someone for not following her belief system.
That brings me to George Brown College and this little nugget. Also wrong on so many levels. See the flyer image. This shows the event has the backing of the college. Hell it shows that George Brown College is squarely opposed to a candidate in an election taking place in another country. Were the conduct taking place in an election in Canada it would be just as deplorable!
Top of the flyer, white text on the blue banner.
G.R. Hambley Photograph
Higher education is supposed to be teaching thinking and not indoctrination. Smarmy Liberal subversive mindsets looking to control the thoughts and feelings of the people that attend those institutions of higher learning.
G.R. Hambley – January 04, 2017
All rights reserved.

Save

It’s A Duck!

It’s a Duck!

I don’t care how you choose to see something for yourself. I do care that when brought to light the choices aren’t sugar coated. I do care that an action is appropriately and correctly called what it is.

Going through my news feeds and I see a story on, The Toronto Star, “Some university students seeking sugar daddy”.

This is the comment I made, “Tell me how this isn’t prostitution? Sexual favours for money. The woman is a hooker, period end of story”. I read the story after I made my comment and reading the story confirmed exactly what I thought and said!

Here is a paragraph from the story, “Now, almost three years and several sugar daddies later, Kashani is set to graduate from Villanova University free and clear, while some of her peers are burdened with six-digit debts”.

The story does note that the same arrangement can be had by men at, “Sugar Mamma” sites. I’m thinking if we call them “Cougars with blingefits” we’re on to something! Let’s be real here, how many under 40 got the coin to make it happen?

Some of the posted comments I saw by women flabbergasted me. Comments that condoned the “Sugar Daddy” agreement.

I truly wonder what these women would say if it was their father, or brother, or son, or significant other who did such a thing and/or got busted for availing himself of a prostitute. What the money is used for by the individual receiving the cash is irrelevant. Can’t you just imagine the conversations?

Let me see if I can make up a short conversation up for you using the premise that “Male Helper” has arrived home after being arrested and “Sanctimonious Female” who had condoned the “Sugar Daddy” behaviour by women knows. I am presuming of course that those two people are talking to each other and the guy was allowed in to his own house.

Male Helper: I was just helping a poor unfortunate girl with tuition fees.
Sanctimonious Female: You went out and got a hooker!
Male Helper: No! I was helping and I distinctly remember you saying you understood those poor girls need.
Sanctimonious Female: You went out and got a hooker!
Male Helper: I remember you saying you didn’t see anything wrong if both people agreed.
Sanctimonious Female: YOU WENT OUT AND GOT A HOOKER!
Male Helper: I did no such thing she’s a student in a cash crunch.
Sanctimonious Female: YOU WENT OUT AND GOT A HOOKER!
Male Helper: Hypocrite.
Sanctimonious Female: Don’t yell at me I’m sensitive.

Sure that exchange is a semi ridiculous argument. Arguing that the woman in the Star story isn’t a hooker is completely ridiculous.

Someone tell me what should be done if the woman reneges on the agreement?

If a man decides to just take what he believes he’s entitled to because he’s paid the woman for it is he guilty of a crime? We got a whole new set of circumstances with repercussion now don’t we?

If a man is paying for the apartment and it is in his name he’s rightfully entitled to have his guest removed if that guest won’t remove themselves. Is the woman going to walk in to a court or tell police there is a sexual agreement in place that allows her to live at said apartment?

In the story it is said the guys paying this woman were more like friends. If that’s the rationalization or justification she wants to make to better cope with what she’s doing, so be it. I can appreciate and fully understand friends with benefits. I also know that money isn’t exchanged between friends with benefits.

Some of the comments I saw by men stated they knew of women who were living the “Sugar Daddy Life” to maintain a standard of living and seeing a “Boy Friend” too. Frankly I see prostitute and client. A couple comments touched on guys who found out what their supposed “Girl Friend” was doing.

So many questions requiring so many answers and not a damn one of those answers good.

Very simply, if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck and flies united like a duck, it’s a duck! Call it what it is. You can figure out exactly what kind of duck later.

Fly United Sketch

Now if this duck eats some other duck’s bread stick because the duck is starving, I’d be empathetic and want to help that duck. If said duck goes after the bread stick because it wants a two story nest, I aint in the least empathetic.

Before I close this off a couple of things for the women.

First, girls lemme tell you, there is something worse a man can call a woman than the “C” word.

Second thing and it is a truth, “Bros before Ho’s”. If you have availed yourself of a Sugar Daddy and a guy ever finds out, he will tell his Bro. When that happens, those two words that are beyond the “C” word will come out.

And women thought guys weren’t sensitive!
That would also be D U C T tape not D U C K!

Seat Note

G.R. Hambley ©
May 30, 2016

Justin Trudeau Will Never Be Ready

Justin Trudeau is emotionally controlling and emotionally controlled and he can not shake it! He doesn’t even try.

Justin Trudeau has not performed to expectations let alone above expectations.

Recognizing and giving credence to what someone was exposed to during formative years is not bashing! Hiding those experiences and refusing to consider them in behaviour is short sighted and unfair.

Trudeau had a couple fine examples of dysfunction to learn from at formative stages. Having your family life spread across the nations news papers must have been a just wonderfully wholesome experience.

Justin Trudeau is a manipulator. He goes from the emotionally controlling passive/aggressive of “Everyone should be a Feminist” to outright grandstanding aggression in the House.

Sun Cov May19-16

It is the duty of the Speaker to instill order in the House with the assistance of the Sargent at Arms if called on by the Speaker. Trudeau knows this! Trudeau did not call on the Speaker to restore order and took it as his divine right to do so himself. Trudeau never should have been anywhere near the line to cross it and he damn well knows that too!

This guy loves to lay on the guilt trip. He conducts himself as if on a mission of divine right. I don’t doubt for a second Trudeau believes he knows better about anything and everything than anyone else does. Not hard to figure out where he learned that wrong behaviour.

I go back and forth on Trudeau wanting to be loved and wanting to be an elitist King. Again, not hard to figure out where these mindsets comes from.

Bottom line, Justin Trudeau is nothing but an actor who flounders when he gets off script. He isn’t quick and he isn’t smart. He’s the PET of Gerald Butts and has been for a long time. You go have a look at what Trudeau allows Butts & Telford to do with caucus.

I posted A Perturbed Canadian’s Parody on April 27. Use the links, one goes to a G&M story on Trudeau’s “Emotional Complexity” and decide for yourself on Trudeau 2.0, honestly.

My “Parody” was written well before Trudeau’s antics in the House.

Justin Trudeau, he’ll never be ready.

G.R. Hambley – all rights reserved
May 20, 2016